| I'm not sure what is worse in a romance novel: a hero who is too good
to be true or a heroine whose actions don't match her alleged
intelligence quotient. Dead Heat has both. Together they weigh down a well-written and suspense-filled story.
Private investigator Daphne Donovan has been hired by a middle-aged
businessman to find an explanation for his younger girlfriend's
strange behavior. What seems to be a standard cheating spouse case
is, in fact, quite different. Far from indulging in more passion on
the side, Nicole is doing her best to get her older man to propose.
By the time Daphne realizes this, a murder/suicide turns her initial
investigation into something involving terrorists and biochemical
weapons. And just when she begins to think she has to go up against
the threat on her own, in walks Sam Bryson to provide all the backup
she needs.
After seeing Daphne once, the ex-Navy SEAL decides she's the one for
him and goes out of the way to make sure she gets the message. They
do have a lot in common, including a past in risk-intensive
professions and a lot of guilt about not making the world much safer
than it is. He is supportive when she goes after the bad guys,
understanding when she needs some time to herself and encouraging
when she wants to play a hunch. And it's not just words either: he
cooks breakfast, helps her sort through smelly garbage and literally
bails her out when she's picked up by the police. An Alpha male in
touch with his sensitive side, this guy is too good to be true and
too contrived to appeal to jaded readers like me. Frankly, I prefer
heroes with a flaw or two. Besides, I'd rather see characters grow
into love than fall right into it.
Fortunately, instant love isn't one of Daphne's problems: she needs a
bit more convincing to acknowledge that Sam's the man for her.
Unfortunately, she has her own shortcomings as a character: most
notably, she doesn't live up to her reputation as a top-notch FBI
agent. Here's a woman who almost stopped the 9/11 attacks (something
that continues to haunt her and understandably so). And yet she
repeatedly blunders in ways that has me doubting her background in
investigation. What kind of an educated adult woman couldn't
calculate the beginning of pregnancy? (And I'm not talking about
knowing the exact date of her last period; I'm referring to simple
menstruation matters.) Then there's the fact that Daphne mentions her
past at the Bureau when filling out an application as part of her
undercover operation. No, doing so doesn't get her into any hot
water - at least not where her investigation is concerned - but that
doesn't redeem her stupidity.
Daphne's thoughtlessness on this occasion probably wouldn't annoy me
so much if the rest of the time she weren't so desperate to keep her
past a secret - to the point of climbing out a toilet window to avoid
probing questions from a date. Anything wrong with a simple "no
comment?"
While the heroine and the hero don't make it into my roster of well-
formed characters, the supporting cast is much more plausible. The
villainess, in particular, is complex and convincing. She has a clear
sense of personal ethics, however heinous her acts. This, along with
a couple of red herrings that keep the suspense going, some
interesting twists and the final chase, pulled the book up from the
two hearts I was initially certain it deserved. And so, while it is
definitely not a must read, Dead Heat gets passing marks.
--Mary Benn
|